NAPR vs. SMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX).
NAPR and SMAX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 31, 2020. SMAX is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Sep 30, 2024.
Performance
NAPR vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NAPR vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 1.71% | 6.56% | 4.17% |
SMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF | -0.49% | 8.01% | 1.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's -0.49% return.
NAPR
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SMAX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NAPR vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NAPR vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank
NAPR
SMAX
NAPR vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAPR | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 2.15 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 3.26 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.49 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.67 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 17.23 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAPR | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.15 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.50 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between NAPR and SMAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NAPR vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison
NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF | 0.98% | 0.98% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
NAPR vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and SMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAPR | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -3.90% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -2.27% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.21% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -0.43% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.48% | +0.55% |
Volatility
NAPR vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) is 0.65%, while iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that NAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NAPR | SMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 1.30% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | 2.14% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.65% | 3.82% | +5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 3.80% | +7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.71% | 3.80% | +6.91% |