PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAPR vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NAPR vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NAPR vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April
1.71%6.56%13.29%30.60%-12.13%9.09%15.90%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
-1.84%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%9.46%26.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's -1.84% return.


NAPR

1D
0.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.71%
6M
3.74%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*

POCT

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
0.02%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NAPR vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NAPR and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

NAPR vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAPR vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAPRPOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

1.06

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

1.61

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.26

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.58

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.15

8.51

+5.65

NAPR vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAPR and POCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAPRPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.06

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.09

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.79

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between NAPR and POCT is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NAPR vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAPR nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Drawdowns

NAPR vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and POCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NAPRPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-18.80%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-7.20%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

-10.22%

-6.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.75%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-1.53%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.33%

-0.30%

Volatility

NAPR vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) is 0.65%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that NAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NAPRPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

3.28%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

5.13%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

10.35%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

7.90%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.71%

10.31%

+0.40%