PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAPR vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NAPR vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NAPR vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April
1.71%6.56%13.29%30.60%-12.13%9.09%15.90%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
-1.00%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%22.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's -1.00% return.


NAPR

1D
0.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.71%
6M
3.74%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*

PJUL

1D
1.63%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
0.81%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NAPR vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NAPR and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

NAPR vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAPR vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAPRPJULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

1.43

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

2.17

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.36

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.10

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.15

11.87

+2.28

NAPR vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAPR and PJUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAPRPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.43

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.10

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.83

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between NAPR and PJUL is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NAPR vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAPR nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Drawdowns

NAPR vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and PJUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NAPRPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-18.17%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-6.99%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

-10.69%

-5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.07%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-1.50%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.24%

-0.21%

Volatility

NAPR vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) is 0.65%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that NAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NAPRPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

2.90%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

4.16%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

10.09%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

8.58%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.71%

10.12%

+0.59%