NAPR vs. PAPR
NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) and PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while PAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NAPR returned 10.10%/yr vs 8.37%/yr for PAPR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
NAPR vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than PAPR's 7.72% return.
NAPR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 14.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
NAPR vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.51% | 6.56% | 13.29% | 30.60% | -12.13% | 9.09% | 15.90% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.72% | 6.58% | 12.28% | 16.45% | -4.29% | 7.51% | 16.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAPR and PAPR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between NAPR and PAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
NAPR vs. PAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NAPR
PAPR
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NAPR
PAPR
Communication Services
NAPR
PAPR
Consumer Cyclical
NAPR
PAPR
Consumer Defensive
NAPR
PAPR
Healthcare
NAPR
PAPR
Industrials
NAPR
PAPR
Utilities
NAPR
PAPR
Basic Materials
NAPR
PAPR
Energy
NAPR
PAPR
Financial Services
NAPR
PAPR
Real Estate
NAPR
PAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAPR vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank
NAPR
PAPR
NAPR vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAPR | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.18 | 2.12 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.95 | 18.05 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.84 | 82.05 | +2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAPR | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78 | 4.56 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.83 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
NAPR vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, which is greater than PAPR's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and PAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAPR | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -15.31% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.24% | -0.83% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -11.87% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -11.87% | -4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.21% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -1.57% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 0.18% | +0.04% |
Volatility
NAPR vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) at 0.86%. This indicates that NAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAPR | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 0.86% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 2.46% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89% | 3.29% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.27% | 8.21% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.61% | 9.44% | +1.17% |
NAPR vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NAPR and PAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
NAPR vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither NAPR nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAPR and PAPR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAPR has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to PAPR (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAPR dropped -16.53% vs PAPR's -15.31%.
On 5-year performance, NAPR leads with 10.10% vs 8.37% for PAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NAPR has performed better with a 10.10% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NAPR and PAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
NAPR and PAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NAPR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PAPR is Defined Outcome. NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while PAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index.
NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 4.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAPR and PAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer