PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAPR vs. KSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAPR vs. KSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than KSEP's 8.77% return.


NAPR

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.09%
YTD
10.51%
6M
11.15%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*

KSEP

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.76%
YTD
8.77%
6M
8.72%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAPR vs. KSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NAPR and KSEP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.65

The correlation between NAPR and KSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAPR vs. KSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

KSEP
KSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
KSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAPR vs. KSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAPRKSEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.18

1.37

+0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.95

4.36

+10.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

84.84

15.77

+69.07

NAPR vs. KSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.78, which is higher than the KSEP Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAPR and KSEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAPRKSEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78

2.04

+2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.03

+0.04

Drawdowns

NAPR vs. KSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, which is greater than KSEP's maximum drawdown of -14.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and KSEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAPRKSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-14.92%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-4.75%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.28%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-2.45%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

1.31%

-1.09%

Volatility

NAPR vs. KSEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) is 1.10%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that NAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAPRKSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.63%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

6.27%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

10.16%

-6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

11.65%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.61%

11.65%

-1.04%

NAPR vs. KSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NAPR and KSEP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

NAPR vs. KSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAPR nor KSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NAPR and KSEP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSEP has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to NAPR (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAPR dropped -16.53% vs KSEP's -14.92%.

On 1-year performance, KSEP leads with 20.63% vs 18.45% for NAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KSEP has performed better with a 20.63% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NAPR and KSEP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

NAPR and KSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NAPR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KSEP is Defined Outcome.

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAPR and KSEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer