PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NAPR vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NAPR vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NAPR returned 9.49%/yr vs 21.18%/yr for EINC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

NAPR vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

NAPR

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
9.27%
6M
9.31%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.98%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAPR vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April		9.27%6.56%13.29%30.60%-12.13%9.09%14.67%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		25.97%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%58.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NAPR and EINC is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2020

0.27

The correlation between NAPR and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NAPR vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
NAPR
EINC

Technology

50.7%

-

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.7%

-

Healthcare

5.1%

-

Industrials

3.3%
2.5%

Utilities

1.6%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.3%

-

Energy

0.7%
99.4%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

NAPR
50.7%
EINC

-

Communication Services

NAPR
15.8%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

NAPR
12.5%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

NAPR
8.7%
EINC

-

Healthcare

NAPR
5.1%
EINC

-

Industrials

NAPR
3.3%
EINC
2.5%

Utilities

NAPR
1.6%
EINC
0.6%

Basic Materials

NAPR
1.3%
EINC

-

Energy

NAPR
0.7%
EINC
99.4%

Financial Services

NAPR
0.2%
EINC

-

Real Estate

NAPR
0.1%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with NAPR:
NAPR vs. JEPQNAPR vs. QQQNAPR vs. AIOONAPR vs. KAPRNAPR vs. SPYNAPR vs. ZMARNAPR vs. VOO
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

NAPR vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAPR vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

NAPREINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.76
1.99

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
6.03
2.67

+3.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.35

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.08

3.80

+5.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

53.80

9.63

+44.17

NAPR vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAPR and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAPR vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NAPREINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-87.55%

+71.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-7.89%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-16.01%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

-19.87%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-4.50%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-44.15%

+41.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

3.10%

-2.80%

Volatility

NAPR vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) is 2.27%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that NAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NAPREINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

6.51%

-4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

11.88%

-8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

15.10%

-10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.31%

19.54%

-8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

25.43%

-14.83%

NAPR vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAPR vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.51%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

NAPR and EINC have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EINC has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to NAPR (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAPR dropped -16.53% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 21.18% vs 9.49% for NAPR. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 21.18% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NAPR.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.00% for NAPR.

NAPR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EINC is Energy Equities. NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NAPR and 0.45% for EINC.

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAPR and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer