NAPR vs. BALT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) and BALT (Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while BALT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NAPR returned 13.26%/yr vs 7.27%/yr for BALT. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BALT.

Performance

NAPR vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAPR achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's 1.91% return.

NAPR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 18.45%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 10.10%
• 10Y*: —

BALT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAPR vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	10.51%	6.56%	13.29%	30.60%	-12.13%	3.74%
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF	1.91%	6.65%	9.98%	7.45%	2.54%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NAPR and BALT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.71

The correlation between NAPR and BALT shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NAPR vs. BALT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NAPR	BALT
Technology	50.7%	36.2%
Communication Services	15.8%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	4.9%
Healthcare	5.1%	8.4%
Industrials	3.3%	8.1%
Utilities	1.6%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.8%
Energy	0.7%	3.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	11.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.9%

Return for Risk

NAPR vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAPR

NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BALT

BALT Risk / Return Rank: 92
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAPR vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAPR	BALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.78	3.19	+1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.66	4.88	+3.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.18	1.67	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.95	6.05	+8.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	84.84	22.58	+62.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAPR vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.78, which is higher than the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAPR and BALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAPR	BALT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.78	3.19	+1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	1.80	-0.73

Drawdowns

NAPR vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPR and BALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAPR	BALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.53%	-4.89%	-11.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.24%	-1.15%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.52%	-4.89%	-9.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.06%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-0.34%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.22%	0.31%	-0.09%

Volatility

NAPR vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.37%. This indicates that NAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAPR	BALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	0.37%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	1.56%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	2.19%	+1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.27%	3.32%	+7.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.61%	3.32%	+7.29%

NAPR vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAPR vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAPR nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAPR and BALT in my portfolio?

NAPR and BALT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAPR or BALT?

NAPR has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to BALT (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAPR dropped -16.53% vs BALT's -4.89%.

Which ETF is better, NAPR or BALT?

On 3-year performance, NAPR leads with 13.26% vs 7.27% for BALT. On fees, BALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NAPR or BALT?

Over the 3-year period, NAPR has performed better with a 13.26% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NAPR or BALT?

BALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NAPR or BALT?

NAPR and BALT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NAPR and BALT?

NAPR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BALT is Defined Outcome. NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while BALT tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NAPR and 0.69% for BALT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.