NANR vs. URAN
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN).
NANR and URAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NANR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2015. URAN is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2024. Both NANR and URAN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NANR vs. URAN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NANR vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 23.68% | 35.35% | -9.59% |
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | 6.65% | 49.05% | 4.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than URAN's 6.65% return.
NANR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 30.97%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 19.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
URAN
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 72.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NANR vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NANR and URAN have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Return for Risk
NANR vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank
NANR
URAN
NANR vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NANR | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 1.80 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 2.40 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.30 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.10 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.72 | 7.08 | +8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NANR | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 1.80 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.01 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between NANR and URAN is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NANR vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison
NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than URAN's 2.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.43% | 1.77% | 2.20% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.83% | 5.01% | 0.01% |
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | 2.40% | 2.56% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NANR vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, which is greater than URAN's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and URAN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NANR | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.15% | -31.96% | -17.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -23.89% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -19.04% | +16.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -10.00% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 10.47% | -7.03% |
Volatility
NANR vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is 5.37%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that NANR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NANR | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 12.00% | -6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.56% | 30.74% | -15.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 40.35% | -17.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 39.21% | -16.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 39.21% | -15.47% |