PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NANR vs. TURF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NANR vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 24.36% return, which is significantly higher than TURF's 19.55% return.


NANR

1D
0.24%
1M
1.75%
YTD
24.36%
6M
26.46%
1Y
54.85%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
12.38%

TURF

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.33%
YTD
19.55%
6M
22.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NANR vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NANR and TURF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.92

NANR vs. TURF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NANR
TURF

Basic Materials

47.1%
33.9%

Energy

41.1%
29.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
8.5%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Technology

0.1%
0.4%

Industrials

0.0%
1.6%

Utilities

0.0%
0.3%

Communication Services

-

3.8%

Financial Services

-

2.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Basic Materials

NANR
47.1%
TURF
33.9%

Energy

NANR
41.1%
TURF
29.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NANR
5.9%
TURF

-

Consumer Defensive

NANR
4.4%
TURF
8.5%

Real Estate

NANR
0.4%
TURF

-

Technology

NANR
0.1%
TURF
0.4%

Industrials

NANR
0.0%
TURF
1.6%

Utilities

NANR
0.0%
TURF
0.3%

Communication Services

NANR

-

TURF
3.8%

Financial Services

NANR

-

TURF
2.3%

Healthcare

NANR

-

TURF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NANR vs. TURF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANR
NANR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

TURF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANR vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NANRTURFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.74

NANR vs. TURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NANRTURFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

2.52

-1.89

Drawdowns

NANR vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -6.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and TURF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NANRTURFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.15%

-6.84%

-42.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-2.54%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-1.53%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

Volatility

NANR vs. TURF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NANRTURFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

16.50%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

16.50%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.53%

16.50%

+7.03%

NANR vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

NANR vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than TURF's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
1.69%1.77%2.20%2.78%2.70%2.61%2.73%2.02%1.95%1.83%5.01%0.01%
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
1.25%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NANR and TURF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NANR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NANR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TURF.

NANR has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.25% for TURF.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NANR and 0.44% for TURF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NANR and TURF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer