NANR vs. FRNRX
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX).
NANR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2015. FRNRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 4, 1995.
Performance
NANR vs. FRNRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NANR vs. FRNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 24.03% | 35.35% | 2.31% | -3.23% | 26.49% | 36.43% | 1.03% | 18.99% | -16.77% | 8.03% |
FRNRX Franklin Natural Resources Fund | 22.80% | 30.43% | 1.28% | 3.25% | 30.52% | 74.38% | -21.58% | 10.03% | -23.78% | 0.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than FRNRX's 22.80% return. Over the past 10 years, NANR has outperformed FRNRX with an annualized return of 14.41%, while FRNRX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.31% annualized return.
NANR
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 31.91%
- 1Y
- 53.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.41%
FRNRX
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 6M
- 31.62%
- 1Y
- 50.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 25.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NANR vs. FRNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NANR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNRX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NANR vs. FRNRX — Risk / Return Rank
NANR
FRNRX
NANR vs. FRNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NANR | FRNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 2.45 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.84 | 3.02 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.12 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 14.67 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NANR | FRNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.45 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.01 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.43 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.29 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between NANR and FRNRX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NANR vs. FRNRX - Dividend Comparison
NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than FRNRX's 1.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.43% | 1.77% | 2.20% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.83% | 5.01% | 0.01% |
FRNRX Franklin Natural Resources Fund | 1.38% | 1.70% | 2.40% | 1.98% | 2.38% | 22.66% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 2.43% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
NANR vs. FRNRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, smaller than the maximum FRNRX drawdown of -80.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and FRNRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NANR | FRNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.15% | -80.54% | +31.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -16.68% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -26.29% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.15% | -70.71% | +21.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -1.75% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -23.95% | +15.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 3.55% | -0.10% |
Volatility
NANR vs. FRNRX - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NANR | FRNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 5.41% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.56% | 13.83% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 21.09% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.09% | 25.82% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 28.70% | -4.96% |