PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NANO.PA vs. AEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Nanobiotix S.A. (NANO.PA) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NANO.PA is traded in EUR, while AEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AEP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANO.PA achieves a 60.21% return, which is significantly higher than AEP.L's 16.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NANO.PA has underperformed AEP.L with an annualized return of 5.21%, while AEP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.


NANO.PA

1D
3.65%
1M
7.35%
YTD
60.21%
6M
67.42%
1Y
679.05%
3Y*
86.19%
5Y*
16.58%
10Y*
5.21%

AEP.L

1D
-3.87%
1M
-17.10%
YTD
16.21%
6M
16.34%
1Y
105.43%
3Y*
28.67%
5Y*
22.41%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NANO.PA
Nanobiotix S.A.
60.21%544.84%-54.46%83.43%-50.48%-47.03%66.67%-28.87%-21.51%-3.95%
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
16.21%112.34%4.16%-10.99%5.88%31.68%-3.88%7.99%-26.75%9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between NANO.PA and AEP.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2012

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANO.PA
NANO.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NANO.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANO.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANO.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NANO.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANO.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AEP.L
AEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nanobiotix S.A. (NANO.PA) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NANO.PAAEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.44

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.56

3.45

+11.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.52

17.82

+18.70

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANO.PA Sharpe Ratio is 7.41, which is higher than the AEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANO.PA and AEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NANO.PAAEP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41

2.34

+5.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.67

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.40

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.21

-0.04

Drawdowns

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANO.PA drawdown since its inception was -93.21%, which is greater than AEP.L's maximum drawdown of -72.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANO.PA and AEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NANO.PAAEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.21%

-72.74%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.36%

-30.40%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.39%

-30.40%

-41.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.56%

-33.99%

-54.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.39%

-63.38%

-29.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.35%

-30.40%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.90%

-25.15%

-23.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.19%

5.90%

+12.29%

Volatility

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nanobiotix S.A. (NANO.PA) is 27.75%, while Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a volatility of 30.79%. This indicates that NANO.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NANO.PAAEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.75%

30.79%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.74%

37.70%

+16.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.41%

44.80%

+44.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.21%

34.01%

+65.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.24%

35.51%

+43.73%

Dividends

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L - Dividend Comparison

NANO.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
4.17%4.80%1.81%4.78%0.51%0.10%0.07%0.40%0.53%0.39%0.26%0.56%
NANO.PA
Nanobiotix S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NANO.PA vs. AEP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nanobiotix S.A. and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. NANO.PA values in EUR, AEP.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


NANO.PA and AEP.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NANO.PA and AEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer