NAN vs. BATVX
NAN (Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund) and BATVX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, NAN returned 0.57%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for BATVX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NAN charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BATVX.
Performance
NAN vs. BATVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAN achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly higher than BATVX's 0.97% return.
NAN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 10.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
BATVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
NAN vs. BATVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAN Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund | 5.94% | 6.57% | 10.20% | 7.72% | -24.07% | 3.25% |
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares | 0.97% | 2.80% | 2.48% | 1.41% | -0.10% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAN and BATVX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAN vs. BATVX — Risk / Return Rank
NAN
BATVX
NAN vs. BATVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAN | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAN | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 3.57 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 2.39 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 2.38 | -2.02 |
Drawdowns
NAN vs. BATVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAN drawdown since its inception was -44.96%, which is greater than BATVX's maximum drawdown of -0.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAN and BATVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAN | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.96% | -0.20% | -44.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.41% | 0.00% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.53% | -0.10% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.64% | -0.20% | -34.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | 0.00% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -0.03% | -8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 0.00% | +1.68% |
Volatility
NAN vs. BATVX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAN) has a higher volatility of 2.18% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) at 0.20%. This indicates that NAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAN | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 0.20% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.42% | 0.49% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.16% | 0.73% | +6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.34% | 0.64% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 0.63% | +10.53% |
NAN vs. BATVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAN has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BATVX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NAN vs. BATVX - Dividend Comparison
NAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than BATVX's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares | 2.55% | 2.76% | 2.44% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NAN Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund | 7.47% | 7.67% | 6.45% | 4.12% | 5.27% | 4.15% | 4.30% | 4.06% | 4.79% | 5.13% | 5.74% | 5.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAN and BATVX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAN has higher volatility (2.18%) compared to BATVX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAN dropped -44.96% vs BATVX's -0.20%.
BATVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAN and BATVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer