PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAMAX vs. FMPOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAMAX vs. FMPOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NAMAX having a 19.64% return and FMPOX slightly higher at 20.03%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NAMAX having a 11.11% annualized return and FMPOX not far ahead at 11.25%.


NAMAX

1D
0.69%
1M
2.16%
YTD
19.64%
6M
19.45%
1Y
36.53%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
11.11%

FMPOX

1D
0.42%
1M
2.36%
YTD
20.03%
6M
20.81%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMAX vs. FMPOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund
19.64%13.77%13.14%9.65%-9.33%32.28%6.90%31.56%-18.46%13.71%
FMPOX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
20.03%13.02%14.48%22.51%-10.62%33.96%0.95%23.61%-18.93%17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMAX and FMPOX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.96

The correlation between NAMAX and FMPOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAMAX vs. FMPOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAMAX
NAMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NAMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FMPOX
FMPOX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FMPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FMPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMAX vs. FMPOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAMAXFMPOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

3.79

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.99

14.59

+2.40

NAMAX vs. FMPOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the FMPOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMAX and FMPOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAMAXFMPOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.42

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.62

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.53

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Drawdowns

NAMAX vs. FMPOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMAX drawdown since its inception was -60.44%, roughly equal to the maximum FMPOX drawdown of -61.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMAX and FMPOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAMAXFMPOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.44%

-61.76%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-10.29%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-23.74%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

-23.74%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.24%

-45.11%

+1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-9.06%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.67%

-0.50%

Volatility

NAMAX vs. FMPOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) is 3.99%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that NAMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMPOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAMAXFMPOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.48%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

12.00%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

16.15%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

20.22%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.05%

21.13%

-1.08%

NAMAX vs. FMPOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAMAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FMPOX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAMAX vs. FMPOX - Dividend Comparison

NAMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than FMPOX's 6.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMPOX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
6.54%8.26%10.51%1.17%13.25%1.31%2.00%1.86%14.92%8.99%1.37%5.23%
NAMAX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund
5.59%6.71%7.07%0.74%6.39%8.99%3.22%3.38%27.38%21.08%8.07%17.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NAMAX and FMPOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMPOX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to NAMAX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMAX dropped -60.44% vs FMPOX's -61.76%.

NAMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAMAX and FMPOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer