PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NADMX vs. NDMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NADMX vs. NDMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund (NADMX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NADMX achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than NDMAX's 10.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NADMX has underperformed NDMAX with an annualized return of 7.25%, while NDMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.


NADMX

1D
0.10%
1M
3.27%
YTD
7.84%
6M
8.56%
1Y
18.79%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
7.25%

NDMAX

1D
0.19%
1M
4.31%
YTD
10.65%
6M
11.68%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NADMX vs. NDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NADMX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund
7.84%13.37%9.46%15.26%-16.17%11.43%10.91%16.50%-6.66%12.24%
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
10.65%15.92%12.14%18.16%-17.78%14.69%12.86%19.67%-8.68%15.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NADMX and NDMAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2000

0.99

The correlation between NADMX and NDMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NADMX vs. NDMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NADMX
NADMX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NDMAX
NDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NADMX vs. NDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund (NADMX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NADMXNDMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.17

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.24

13.58

-0.34

NADMX vs. NDMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NADMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the NDMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NADMX and NDMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NADMXNDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.39

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.63

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.39

+0.07

Drawdowns

NADMX vs. NDMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NADMX drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, smaller than the maximum NDMAX drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADMX and NDMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NADMXNDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-47.85%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-7.75%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.18%

-13.33%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-27.51%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.70%

-33.00%

+6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-8.18%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.80%

-0.36%

Volatility

NADMX vs. NDMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund (NADMX) is 2.73%, while Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that NADMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NADMXNDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

3.23%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.63%

8.31%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.15%

10.25%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

13.65%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.31%

14.48%

-3.17%

NADMX vs. NDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NADMX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than NDMAX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

NADMX vs. NDMAX - Dividend Comparison

NADMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than NDMAX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NADMX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund
6.83%7.28%13.03%6.02%3.57%5.41%5.11%4.90%12.09%6.93%7.38%8.72%
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
8.43%9.28%16.19%6.30%3.88%5.83%5.68%8.26%14.63%10.61%8.26%7.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, NADMX and NDMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NDMAX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to NADMX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NADMX dropped -36.95% vs NDMAX's -47.85%.

NDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NADMX and NDMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer