NADCX vs. AOBLX
NADCX (Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund) and AOBLX (Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, NADCX returned 5.42%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for AOBLX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NADCX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AOBLX.
Performance
NADCX vs. AOBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADCX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than AOBLX's 12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NADCX has underperformed AOBLX with an annualized return of 5.42%, while AOBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.
NADCX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 5.42%
AOBLX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
NADCX vs. AOBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADCX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund | 4.85% | 10.98% | 6.76% | 11.80% | -14.20% | 7.63% | 9.77% | 12.53% | -4.34% | 8.37% |
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A | 12.92% | 19.59% | 9.46% | 15.00% | -14.64% | 15.10% | 13.15% | 21.75% | -4.63% | 14.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADCX and AOBLX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2000 | 0.91 |
The correlation between NADCX and AOBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADCX vs. AOBLX — Risk / Return Rank
NADCX
AOBLX
NADCX vs. AOBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NADCX | AOBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.57 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 4.83 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 22.31 | -11.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NADCX vs. AOBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADCX drawdown since its inception was -24.64%, smaller than the maximum AOBLX drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADCX and AOBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADCX | AOBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.64% | -36.70% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.21% | -6.42% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.93% | -13.52% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.23% | -20.48% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.23% | -24.31% | +4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -1.38% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -3.81% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 1.39% | -0.21% |
Volatility
NADCX vs. AOBLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX) is 2.82%, while Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that NADCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADCX | AOBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 3.69% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | 7.85% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.84% | 9.98% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.03% | 11.16% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 11.34% | -3.45% |
NADCX vs. AOBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADCX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AOBLX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
NADCX vs. AOBLX - Dividend Comparison
NADCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than AOBLX's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A | 3.20% | 3.48% | 2.28% | 1.52% | 2.97% | 8.33% | 4.31% | 5.78% | 9.70% | 9.22% | 2.51% | 3.97% |
NADCX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund | 4.21% | 4.76% | 9.54% | 4.85% | 2.89% | 3.22% | 4.17% | 3.27% | 8.13% | 4.95% | 4.58% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NADCX and AOBLX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOBLX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to NADCX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NADCX dropped -24.64% vs AOBLX's -36.70%.
AOBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NADCX and AOBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer