NACP vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NACP is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NACP charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

NACP vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NACP

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 8.57%
• YTD: 22.35%
• 6M: 21.44%
• 1Y: 44.11%
• 3Y*: 27.38%
• 5Y*: 16.01%
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NACP vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	1.28%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between NACP and GRW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.30

NACP vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NACP	GRW
Technology	35.8%	26.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	8.3%
Financial Services	10.6%	9.8%
Communication Services	9.8%	9.1%
Healthcare	9.2%	4.1%
Industrials	8.7%	38.1%
Energy	5.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	-
Utilities	3.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	4.0%
Real Estate	1.3%	-

Return for Risk

NACP vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NACP

NACP Risk / Return Rank: 89
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NACP vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NACP	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NACP	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	13.58	-12.65

Drawdowns

NACP vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NACP drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NACP and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	NACP	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-0.45%	-30.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.27%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-0.17%	-5.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NACP	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	8.89%	+5.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	8.89%	+8.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.69%	8.89%	+9.80%

NACP vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NACP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NACP vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF	0.55%	0.62%	2.96%	1.28%	3.48%	3.06%	1.48%	1.22%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NACP and GRW in my portfolio?

NACP and GRW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NACP or GRW?

On fees, NACP is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NACP or GRW?

NACP is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NACP or GRW?

NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between NACP and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NACP and 0.75% for GRW.