NACP vs. CSHP
NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NACP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. NACP is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, NACP returned 44.34% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NACP charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
NACP vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NACP achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.86% return.
NACP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 22.92%
- 6M
- 20.91%
- 1Y
- 44.34%
- 3Y*
- 26.68%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NACP vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.92% | 21.38% | 4.41% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.86% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between NACP and CSHP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.05 |
The correlation between NACP and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NACP vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
NACP
CSHP
NACP vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NACP | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 6.67 | -5.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 65.84 | -61.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.78 | 395.75 | -375.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NACP vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NACP drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NACP and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NACP | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -0.08% | -30.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -0.06% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.01% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -0.00% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 0.01% | +2.24% |
Volatility
NACP vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.15%. This indicates that NACP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NACP | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 0.15% | +6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 0.27% | +12.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 0.36% | +14.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 0.41% | +17.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 0.41% | +18.35% |
NACP vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NACP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
NACP vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NACP and CSHP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to CSHP (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NACP dropped -30.96% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, NACP leads with 44.34% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NACP has performed better with a 44.34% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
NACP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NACP and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.22 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NACP and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer