NA.TO vs. XLK
NA.TO (National Bank of Canada) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, NA.TO returned 21.48%/yr vs 26.27%/yr for XLK. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NA.TO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NA.TO is traded in CAD, while XLK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NA.TO achieves a 22.40% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 31.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NA.TO has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 21.48%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.27% annualized return.
NA.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 22.40%
- 6M
- 23.26%
- 1Y
- 59.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.78%
- 5Y*
- 22.51%
- 10Y*
- 21.48%
XLK
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 31.13%
- 6M
- 30.81%
- 1Y
- 59.71%
- 3Y*
- 32.23%
- 5Y*
- 25.59%
- 10Y*
- 26.27%
NA.TO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 22.40% | 36.15% | 34.65% | 15.53% | -1.45% | 39.02% | 4.01% | 34.04% | -6.92% | 19.77% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 31.13% | 18.92% | 31.93% | 52.31% | -23.15% | 34.68% | 40.21% | 43.68% | 6.59% | 25.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NA.TO and XLK is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NA.TO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
NA.TO
XLK
NA.TO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NA.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.41 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.73 | 3.52 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.50 | 10.37 | +12.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NA.TO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NA.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -38.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA.TO and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NA.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -38.68% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -16.16% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -26.35% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -29.64% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -29.64% | -18.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -5.87% | +4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -7.56% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 5.48% | -2.80% |
Volatility
NA.TO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) is 6.17%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that NA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NA.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 10.83% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 19.12% | -5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 22.68% | -6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 25.91% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 25.57% | -4.63% |
Dividends
NA.TO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
NA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 2.31% | 2.75% | 3.36% | 4.03% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.77% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 5.16% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NA.TO and XLK have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NA.TO and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer