N4US.L vs. IJPH.L
N4US.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)) and IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - N4US.L tracks the JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index while IJPH.L tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, N4US.L returned 16.34%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for IJPH.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. N4US.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IJPH.L.
Performance
N4US.L vs. IJPH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
N4US.L is traded in USD, while IJPH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IJPH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with N4US.L having a 18.80% return and IJPH.L slightly lower at 17.86%. Over the past 10 years, N4US.L has outperformed IJPH.L with an annualized return of 16.34%, while IJPH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 15.10% annualized return.
N4US.L
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- YTD
- 18.80%
- 1Y
- 45.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.49%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
IJPH.L
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 17.86%
- 1Y
- 46.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
N4US.L vs. IJPH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N4US.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 18.80% | 30.25% | 23.77% | 35.97% | -1.05% | 11.18% | 10.79% | 19.49% | -15.75% | 22.99% |
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 17.86% | 39.14% | 21.76% | 41.27% | -14.53% | 10.92% | 12.62% | 20.59% | -20.65% | 30.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between N4US.L and IJPH.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2015 | 0.86 |
The correlation between N4US.L and IJPH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
N4US.L vs. IJPH.L — Risk / Return Rank
N4US.L
IJPH.L
N4US.L vs. IJPH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| N4US.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 3.88 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.48 | 13.80 | +2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
N4US.L vs. IJPH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum N4US.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum IJPH.L drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for N4US.L and IJPH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| N4US.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -45.23% | +14.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -11.86% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.38% | -22.91% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -30.65% | +9.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.94% | -44.24% | +13.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.48% | -5.19% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -12.07% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.34% | -0.59% |
Volatility
N4US.L vs. IJPH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) is 6.15%, while iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that N4US.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| N4US.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 7.74% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 18.49% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.57% | 23.14% | -3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 22.27% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 21.81% | -3.43% |
N4US.L vs. IJPH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
N4US.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPH.L's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
N4US.L vs. IJPH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither N4US.L nor IJPH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, N4US.L and IJPH.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, N4US.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
N4US.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.
N4US.L tracks JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index, while IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for N4US.L and 0.64% for IJPH.L.
Find the right allocation for N4US.L and IJPH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer