N400.L vs. IJPH.L
N400.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF JPY (Acc)) and IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - N400.L tracks the JPX-Nikkei Index 400 while IJPH.L tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, N400.L returned 8.89%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for IJPH.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. N400.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IJPH.L.
Performance
N400.L vs. IJPH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
N400.L is traded in USD, while IJPH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IJPH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, N400.L achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly lower than IJPH.L's 17.86% return. Over the past 10 years, N400.L has underperformed IJPH.L with an annualized return of 8.89%, while IJPH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.10% annualized return.
N400.L
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
IJPH.L
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 17.86%
- 1Y
- 46.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
N400.L vs. IJPH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF JPY (Acc) | 12.82% | 25.87% | 6.53% | 20.26% | -15.79% | -0.37% | 15.93% | 17.97% | -14.20% | 24.80% |
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 17.86% | 39.14% | 21.76% | 41.27% | -14.53% | 10.92% | 12.62% | 20.59% | -20.65% | 30.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between N400.L and IJPH.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2014 | 0.82 |
The correlation between N400.L and IJPH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
N400.L vs. IJPH.L — Risk / Return Rank
N400.L
IJPH.L
N400.L vs. IJPH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF JPY (Acc) (N400.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| N400.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.88 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 13.80 | -5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
N400.L vs. IJPH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum N400.L drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum IJPH.L drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for N400.L and IJPH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| N400.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -45.23% | +12.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -11.86% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.55% | -22.91% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -30.65% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.66% | -44.24% | +11.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.24% | -5.19% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -12.07% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 3.34% | +0.27% |
Volatility
N400.L vs. IJPH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF JPY (Acc) (N400.L) is 6.36%, while iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that N400.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| N400.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 7.74% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 18.49% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 23.14% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 22.27% | -4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 21.81% | -4.87% |
N400.L vs. IJPH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
N400.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPH.L's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
N400.L vs. IJPH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither N400.L nor IJPH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
N400.L and IJPH.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, N400.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
N400.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.
N400.L tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for N400.L and 0.64% for IJPH.L.
Find the right allocation for N400.L and IJPH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer