PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE) and Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWOW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, N1ES.DE achieves a 21.31% return, which is significantly higher than MWOW.DE's 7.34% return.


N1ES.DE

1D
-0.74%
1M
8.84%
YTD
21.31%
6M
19.74%
1Y
39.34%
3Y*
25.46%
5Y*
10Y*

MWOW.DE

1D
-0.35%
1M
4.91%
YTD
7.34%
6M
6.25%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
N1ES.DE
Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc
21.31%8.26%11.36%
MWOW.DE
Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating
7.34%4.92%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between N1ES.DE and MWOW.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024

0.94

The correlation between N1ES.DE and MWOW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

N1ES.DE
N1ES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
N1ES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N1ES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
N1ES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
N1ES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
N1ES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MWOW.DE
MWOW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MWOW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE) and Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWOW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


N1ES.DEMWOW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

1.56

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

4.43

+6.19

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current N1ES.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the MWOW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of N1ES.DE and MWOW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


N1ES.DEMWOW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.48

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.81

+0.01

Drawdowns

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum N1ES.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, which is greater than MWOW.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for N1ES.DE and MWOW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


N1ES.DEMWOW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-27.10%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-14.64%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.48%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-6.07%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

5.18%

-1.40%

Volatility

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWOW.DE) at 3.71%. This indicates that N1ES.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


N1ES.DEMWOW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

3.71%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

10.29%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

15.41%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

20.20%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

20.20%

+0.53%

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

N1ES.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOW.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

N1ES.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither N1ES.DE nor MWOW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, N1ES.DE and MWOW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MWOW.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWOW.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for N1ES.DE.

N1ES.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MWOW.DE is Large Cap Growth Equities. N1ES.DE tracks Nasdaq 100® ESG, while MWOW.DE tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for N1ES.DE and 0.19% for MWOW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for N1ES.DE and MWOW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer