PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYN vs. BSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYN vs. BSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) and BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYN achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than BSIIX's 1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MYN has underperformed BSIIX with an annualized return of 0.89%, while BSIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.60% annualized return.


MYN

1D
-0.51%
1M
-4.33%
6M
-0.96%
YTD
1.45%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
-2.92%
10Y*
0.89%
ALL TIME*
2.98%

BSIIX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.13%
6M
0.11%
YTD
1.03%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
6.24%
5Y*
2.75%
10Y*
3.60%
ALL TIME*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.04M$1.54M$1.33M

MYN vs. BSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MYN
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
1.45%4.67%2.87%9.80%-27.05%10.83%6.00%18.31%-7.05%6.96%
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
1.03%8.59%5.22%6.18%-6.14%0.80%7.22%7.65%-0.42%4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MYN and BSIIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2008

0.22

Over the past year, MYN and BSIIX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYN vs. BSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MYN
MYN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BSIIX
BSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MYN vs. BSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) and BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYNBSIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.76

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.23

6.43

+0.79

MYN vs. BSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYN Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the BSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYN and BSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYN vs. BSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYN drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than BSIIX's maximum drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYN and BSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYNBSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-18.76%

-24.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-2.84%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-2.84%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.89%

-9.13%

-26.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

-9.91%

-26.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.13%

-1.25%

-12.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-1.80%

-8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

0.78%

+0.91%

Volatility

MYN vs. BSIIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) at 0.69%. This indicates that MYN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYNBSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

0.69%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

2.44%

+4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

2.99%

+5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

3.04%

+8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

3.15%

+8.25%

MYN vs. BSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYN has a 2.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BSIIX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYN vs. BSIIX - Dividend Comparison

MYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than BSIIX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
4.83%5.07%4.75%3.33%3.58%2.98%2.92%3.54%3.32%3.45%2.91%3.19%
MYN
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
6.33%6.20%5.47%3.88%5.37%4.39%4.16%3.90%4.32%4.98%5.44%5.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYN and BSIIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MYN has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to BSIIX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYN dropped -42.89% vs BSIIX's -18.76%.

BSIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYN and BSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer