MYN vs. ASFYX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MYN (BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund) and ASFYX (AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y) are both mutual funds - MYN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while ASFYX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, MYN returned 1.28%/yr vs 2.39%/yr for ASFYX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYN charges 2.24%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for ASFYX.

Performance

MYN vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYN achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 9.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MYN has underperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 1.28%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.39% annualized return.

MYN

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 13.64%
• 3Y*: 5.50%
• 5Y*: -1.50%
• 10Y*: 1.28%

ASFYX

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 21.04%
• 3Y*: -2.84%
• 5Y*: 2.40%
• 10Y*: 2.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYN vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MYN BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	4.79%	4.67%	2.87%	9.80%	-27.05%	10.83%	6.00%	18.31%	-7.05%	6.96%
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y	9.82%	-9.67%	-3.22%	-10.33%	35.67%	3.52%	13.59%	8.99%	-12.59%	6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MYN and ASFYX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2010	0.00

The correlation between MYN and ASFYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (5 years) to 0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MYN vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYN

MYN Risk / Return Rank: 40
MYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MYN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MYN Martin Ratio Rank: 39

ASFYX

ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 54
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYN vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MYN	ASFYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.76	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	2.34	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	3.66	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.47	12.09	-4.63

MYN vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYN Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYN and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MYN vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYN drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYN and ASFYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYN	ASFYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.89%	-36.43%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.40%	-5.87%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.65%	-30.32%	+13.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.99%	-36.43%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.99%	-36.43%	+0.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.31%	-22.07%	+10.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.50%	-13.20%	+2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	1.77%	+0.06%

Volatility

MYN vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN) is 2.07%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that MYN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYN	ASFYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.07%	4.09%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.71%	10.06%	-3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.79%	12.19%	-3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	13.79%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.41%	12.72%	-1.31%

MYN vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYN has a 2.24% expense ratio, which is higher than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

MYN vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

MYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than ASFYX's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y	1.38%	1.52%	1.46%	0.99%	32.48%	6.07%	3.40%	5.51%	1.30%	0.07%	0.01%	5.06%
MYN BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	6.10%	6.20%	5.47%	3.88%	5.37%	4.39%	4.16%	3.90%	4.32%	4.98%	5.44%	5.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYN and ASFYX in my portfolio?

MYN and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYN or ASFYX?

ASFYX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to MYN (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYN dropped -42.89% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.