PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYMH vs. SCMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYMH vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYMH achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than SCMB's 1.15% return.


MYMH

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.03%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCMB

1D
0.08%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.67%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
3.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYMH vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYMH
State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF
0.75%3.21%-0.96%
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
1.15%3.78%-0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MYMH and SCMB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.70

The correlation between MYMH and SCMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYMH vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYMH
MYMH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MYMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MYMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYMH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SCMB
SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYMH vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYMHSCMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.47

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

2.26

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

7.53

+5.14

MYMH vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYMH Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYMH and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYMHSCMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

2.26

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.98

-0.30

Drawdowns

MYMH vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYMH drawdown since its inception was -2.67%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMH and SCMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYMHSCMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-6.13%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-2.92%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.79%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-1.32%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.87%

-0.55%

Volatility

MYMH vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) is 0.26%, while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that MYMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYMHSCMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

1.04%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.89%

2.17%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29%

2.94%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.62%

4.16%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.62%

4.16%

-1.54%

MYMH vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYMH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYMH vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

MYMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than SCMB's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MYMH
State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF
2.91%3.01%0.88%0.00%0.00%
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
3.53%3.36%3.34%3.10%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYMH and SCMB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCMB has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to MYMH (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYMH dropped -2.67% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

On 1-year performance, SCMB leads with 6.56% vs 4.05% for MYMH. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MYMH has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCMB has performed better with a 6.56% return vs 4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MYMH.

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.91% for MYMH.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMH and 0.03% for SCMB.

MYMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYMH and SCMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer