MYMH vs. AUSM
MYMH (State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF) and AUSM (Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYMH charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AUSM.
Performance
MYMH vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYMH achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than AUSM's 0.98% return.
MYMH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUSM
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MYMH vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MYMH State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.75% | 2.51% |
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 0.98% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYMH and AUSM is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYMH vs. AUSM — Risk / Return Rank
MYMH
AUSM
MYMH vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMH) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYMH | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYMH | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 3.98 | -3.30 |
Drawdowns
MYMH vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYMH drawdown since its inception was -2.67%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMH and AUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYMH | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -0.42% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.02% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -0.09% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | — | — |
Volatility
MYMH vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYMH | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29% | 0.73% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 0.73% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 0.73% | +1.89% |
MYMH vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYMH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYMH vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison
MYMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than AUSM's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 2.39% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
MYMH State Street My2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.91% | 3.01% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYMH and AUSM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MYMH.
MYMH has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.39% for AUSM.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMH and 0.18% for AUSM.
Find the right allocation for MYMH and AUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer