PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYIIX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYIIX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay WMC International Research Equity Fund (MYIIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYIIX achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 9.40% return.


MYIIX

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.45%
6M
7.54%
YTD
11.49%
1Y
29.43%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
7.60%

FHLFX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.12%
6M
6.23%
YTD
9.40%
1Y
20.56%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYIIX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MYIIX
MainStay WMC International Research Equity Fund
11.49%39.10%7.56%13.56%-15.94%10.65%1.75%17.15%-13.46%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.40%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MYIIX and FHLFX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.90

The correlation between MYIIX and FHLFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYIIX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYIIX
MYIIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MYIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MYIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYIIX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC International Research Equity Fund (MYIIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYIIXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.79

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

6.68

+3.31

MYIIX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYIIX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYIIX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYIIX drawdown since its inception was -62.79%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYIIX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYIIXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.79%

-33.58%

-29.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-11.37%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.81%

-13.62%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.71%

-29.36%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-2.02%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.10%

-6.04%

-11.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.04%

-0.09%

Volatility

MYIIX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay WMC International Research Equity Fund (MYIIX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 5.03%. This indicates that MYIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYIIXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

5.03%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

13.11%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

15.52%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

16.10%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

17.64%

-1.85%

MYIIX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYIIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYIIX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

MYIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MYIIX
MainStay WMC International Research Equity Fund
2.62%2.92%1.88%2.05%1.98%2.74%2.13%10.18%6.35%1.76%3.16%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYIIX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MYIIX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to FHLFX (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYIIX dropped -62.79% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

MYIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYIIX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer