MYHA vs. ZFH.TO
MYHA (State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ZFH.TO (BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYHA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ZFH.TO.
Performance
MYHA vs. ZFH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MYHA is traded in USD, while ZFH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZFH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
MYHA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ZFH.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 0.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $845.05 | $2.44K | $8.52K | |
| $164.14K | $155.16K | $186.30K |
MYHA vs. ZFH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MYHA State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.48% |
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYHA and ZFH.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYHA vs. ZFH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MYHA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZFH.TO
MYHA vs. ZFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHA) and BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MYHA | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MYHA vs. ZFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYHA drawdown since its inception was -0.69%, smaller than the maximum ZFH.TO drawdown of -28.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYHA and ZFH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYHA | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -28.99% | +28.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -2.69% | +2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -6.52% | +6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
MYHA vs. ZFH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYHA | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77% | 6.28% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 10.50% | -8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 12.10% | -10.33% |
MYHA vs. ZFH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYHA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ZFH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MYHA vs. ZFH.TO - Dividend Comparison
MYHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than ZFH.TO's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYHA State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 5.17% | 5.58% | 7.82% | 7.07% | 4.81% | 4.54% | 4.57% | 4.32% | 4.51% | 4.64% | 4.70% | 5.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYHA and ZFH.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MYHA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MYHA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZFH.TO.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MYHA and 0.40% for ZFH.TO.
Find the right allocation for MYHA and ZFH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer