PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCO vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCO vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA My2035 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCO) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCO achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 1.91% return.


MYCO

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.68%
6M
-1.23%
YTD
-1.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

FLDR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.12%
6M
1.63%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.43M$13.11M$20.45M
$9.85K$14.84K$23.81K

MYCO vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MYCO and FLDR is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCO vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MYCO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MYCO vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA My2035 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCO) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MYCOFLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

59.67

MYCO vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MYCO vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCO drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, smaller than the maximum FLDR drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCO and FLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCOFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-12.23%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-0.04%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-0.34%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

Volatility

MYCO vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCOFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.66%

0.81%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

1.21%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

5.21%

-0.55%

MYCO vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MYCO and FLDR have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYCO vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

MYCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than FLDR's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.29%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%
MYCO
SPDR SSGA My2035 Corporate Bond ETF
3.85%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCO and FLDR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MYCO and FLDR have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 3.85% for MYCO.

MYCO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLDR is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCO and FLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer