PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCM vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCM vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCM achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 3.00% return.


MYCM

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.38%
1Y
6.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDM

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.00%
6M
5.60%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCM vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCM
State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF
0.42%9.21%-3.14%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
3.00%64.20%-1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCM and GLDM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCM vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCM
MYCM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MYCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCM vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCMGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.70

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

4.23

+3.75

MYCM vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCM and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCMGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.24

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.02

-0.30

Drawdowns

MYCM vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCM drawdown since its inception was -4.58%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCM and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCMGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-21.63%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-19.14%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-17.65%

+16.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-6.22%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

7.69%

-6.87%

Volatility

MYCM vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCM) is 1.25%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that MYCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCMGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

5.47%

-4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

22.99%

-20.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

26.39%

-22.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

17.91%

-12.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

16.85%

-11.73%

MYCM vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MYCM vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

MYCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MYCM
State Street My2033 Corporate Bond ETF
4.74%4.70%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCM and GLDM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to MYCM (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCM dropped -4.58% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

On 1-year performance, GLDM leads with 32.42% vs 6.52% for MYCM. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, MYCM has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 32.42% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MYCM.

MYCM has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

MYCM is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GLDM is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCM and 0.10% for GLDM.

MYCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCM and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer