PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCJ vs. DCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCJ vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCJ achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 34.49% return.


MYCJ

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.47%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCMT

1D
0.63%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
34.49%
6M
33.53%
1Y
42.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCJ vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCJ
State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF
0.23%8.32%-2.26%
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
34.49%6.04%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCJ and DCMT is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

-0.19

The correlation between MYCJ and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCJ vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCJ
MYCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MYCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCJ vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCJDCMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

6.83

-4.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

16.31

-7.74

MYCJ vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCJ and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCJDCMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.32

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.20

-0.22

Drawdowns

MYCJ vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCJ drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCJ and DCMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCJDCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-11.95%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-6.21%

+4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-3.46%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-3.13%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

2.59%

-2.00%

Volatility

MYCJ vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCJ) is 0.90%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that MYCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCJDCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

6.71%

-5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

15.87%

-13.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

18.27%

-15.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.65%

15.77%

-12.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

15.77%

-12.12%

MYCJ vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYCJ vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

MYCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than DCMT's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
2.73%3.67%1.59%
MYCJ
State Street My2030 Corporate Bond ETF
4.65%4.68%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCJ and DCMT have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCMT has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to MYCJ (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCJ dropped -3.29% vs DCMT's -11.95%.

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 42.19% vs 5.01% for MYCJ. On fees, MYCJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 42.19% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

MYCJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 2.73% for DCMT.

MYCJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCJ and 0.66% for DCMT.

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCJ and DCMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer