PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MYCF vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MYCF vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCF achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 2.92% return.


MYCF

1D
0.04%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCF vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MYCF
State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF
1.63%5.12%0.74%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%-1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCF and GLD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MYCF vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCF
MYCF Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MYCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCF Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCF vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MYCFGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+11.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.22

1.24

+1.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

38.53

1.68

+36.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

164.09

4.15

+159.93

MYCF vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCF Sharpe Ratio is 6.98, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCF and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MYCFGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.98

1.21

+5.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.12

0.60

+3.52

Drawdowns

MYCF vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCF drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCF and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MYCFGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-45.56%

+44.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

-19.21%

+19.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.75%

+17.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-16.16%

+16.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

7.73%

-7.70%

Volatility

MYCF vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) is 0.15%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that MYCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MYCFGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

5.51%

-5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.43%

23.16%

-22.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66%

26.61%

-25.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.09%

18.00%

-16.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.09%

15.95%

-14.86%

MYCF vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MYCF vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

MYCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MYCF
State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF
4.40%4.50%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


MYCF and GLD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to MYCF (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCF dropped -0.60% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 1-year performance, GLD leads with 32.04% vs 4.60% for MYCF. On fees, MYCF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCF has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLD has performed better with a 32.04% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

MYCF has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

MYCF is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCF and 0.40% for GLD.

MYCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.98 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MYCF and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer