PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXXIX vs. LSHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXXIX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXXIX achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 36.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MXXIX has underperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 16.90%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.91% annualized return.


MXXIX

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.72%
YTD
14.23%
6M
14.38%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
32.30%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
16.90%

LSHAX

1D
7.48%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
36.21%
6M
28.17%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
29.95%
5Y*
15.22%
10Y*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXXIX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXXIX
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
14.23%26.09%42.95%21.71%-31.84%12.04%45.34%29.88%1.76%30.05%
LSHAX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund
36.21%-19.53%82.16%-19.74%39.45%42.75%5.23%31.30%-8.18%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MXXIX and LSHAX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2007

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between MXXIX and LSHAX has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXXIX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXXIX
MXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LSHAX
LSHAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LSHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
LSHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXXIX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXXIXLSHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.07

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

0.32

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

0.59

+7.72

MXXIX vs. LSHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the LSHAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXXIX and LSHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXXIXLSHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.22

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.45

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.58

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.32

+0.09

Drawdowns

MXXIX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXXIX drawdown since its inception was -62.49%, smaller than the maximum LSHAX drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXXIX and LSHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXXIXLSHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.49%

-69.03%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-25.71%

+12.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.05%

-45.79%

+25.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.59%

-45.79%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

-50.78%

+10.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-23.40%

+22.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.36%

-21.94%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

14.23%

-10.79%

Volatility

MXXIX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) is 6.30%, while Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that MXXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXXIXLSHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

11.46%

-5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

30.75%

-15.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.29%

37.89%

-18.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

34.34%

-11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.81%

30.75%

-8.94%

MXXIX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXXIX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXXIX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison

MXXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, more than LSHAX's 8.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LSHAX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund
8.51%11.59%4.66%9.40%1.76%0.11%0.53%0.00%4.85%3.94%1.84%
MXXIX
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
10.46%11.95%9.18%1.24%0.00%14.22%2.83%3.26%5.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXXIX and LSHAX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSHAX has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to MXXIX (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXXIX dropped -62.49% vs LSHAX's -69.03%.

MXXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXXIX and LSHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer