PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXXIX vs. FMCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXXIX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXXIX achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than FMCSX's 19.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MXXIX has outperformed FMCSX with an annualized return of 17.60%, while FMCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.35% annualized return.


MXXIX

1D
0.49%
1M
2.34%
YTD
17.28%
6M
14.79%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
32.77%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
17.60%

FMCSX

1D
0.51%
1M
2.29%
YTD
19.11%
6M
16.67%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXXIX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXXIX
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
17.28%26.09%42.95%21.71%-31.84%12.04%45.34%29.88%1.76%30.05%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
19.11%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MXXIX and FMCSX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2000

0.85

The correlation between MXXIX and FMCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXXIX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXXIX
MXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXXIX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXXIXFMCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.64

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

13.94

-6.29

MXXIX vs. FMCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the FMCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXXIX and FMCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXXIX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXXIX drawdown since its inception was -62.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FMCSX drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXXIX and FMCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXXIXFMCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.49%

-62.19%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-8.55%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.05%

-22.33%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.59%

-22.33%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

-40.55%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.31%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-9.34%

-8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.23%

+1.23%

Volatility

MXXIX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison

Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) at 5.75%. This indicates that MXXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXXIXFMCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

5.75%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

12.89%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

16.23%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.93%

17.78%

+5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

18.58%

+3.28%

MXXIX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXXIX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCSX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXXIX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison

MXXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.19%, more than FMCSX's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
5.20%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%
MXXIX
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
10.19%11.95%9.18%1.24%0.00%14.22%2.83%3.26%5.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXXIX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXXIX has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to FMCSX (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXXIX dropped -62.49% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.

FMCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXXIX and FMCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer