PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MXWS.L (Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF) and PRWU.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXWS.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRWU.L.

Performance

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWS.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXWS.L is traded in GBp, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

MXWS.L

1D
0.04%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.17%
6M
10.37%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
14.18%

PRWU.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MXWS.L
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF		10.17%12.63%21.11%17.73%2.01%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)		0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MXWS.L and PRWU.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.64

The correlation between MXWS.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MXWS.L
PRWU.L

Technology

28.3%
27.0%

Financial Services

15.7%
15.8%

Industrials

11.4%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.5%

Communication Services

9.3%
8.1%

Healthcare

8.8%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
6.1%

Energy

4.2%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
3.2%

Utilities

2.7%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.1%

Technology

MXWS.L
28.3%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Financial Services

MXWS.L
15.7%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Industrials

MXWS.L
11.4%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MXWS.L
9.3%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Communication Services

MXWS.L
9.3%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Healthcare

MXWS.L
8.8%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

MXWS.L
5.2%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Energy

MXWS.L
4.2%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Basic Materials

MXWS.L
3.3%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Utilities

MXWS.L
2.7%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Real Estate

MXWS.L
1.9%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF

Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)

Often compared with MXWS.L:
MXWS.L vs. MXWO.LMXWS.L vs. FWRGMXWS.L vs. SWDA.LMXWS.L vs. VTMXWS.L vs. TSWE.ASMXWS.L vs. VUAA.LMXWS.L vs. IWDA.L
Often compared with PRWU.L:
PRWU.L vs. SPYI.DEPRWU.L vs. VWRA.LPRWU.L vs. SWDA.LPRWU.L vs. LILMPRWU.L vs. CSPX.LPRWU.L vs. SWRD.LPRWU.L vs. VT

Return for Risk

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MXWS.L
MXWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MXWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MXWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWS.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MXWS.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.69

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.68

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.68

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MXWS.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

—

—

Drawdowns

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MXWS.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.29%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.29%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

—

—

Volatility

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MXWS.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

—

—

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXWS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MXWS.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXWS.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

MXWS.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for MXWS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXWS.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXWS.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer