MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L
MXWO.L (Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXWO.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXWO.L returned 13.12%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXWO.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MXWO.L is traded in USD, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MXWO.L having a 9.99% return and SPXP.L slightly higher at 10.28%. Over the past 10 years, MXWO.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 13.12%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
MXWO.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXWO.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | 9.99% | 20.83% | 19.19% | 24.56% | -18.08% | 22.12% | 16.27% | 27.41% | -9.08% | 22.79% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.28% | 17.79% | 25.46% | 26.40% | -18.54% | 30.07% | 17.39% | 31.85% | -5.42% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXWO.L and SPXP.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.78 |
The correlation between MXWO.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Financial Services
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Communication Services
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Healthcare
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Energy
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Utilities
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Real Estate
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXWO.L
SPXP.L
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXWO.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 3.23 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.34 | 13.97 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXWO.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.53 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.90 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 1.01 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.96 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXWO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXWO.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXWO.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -33.47% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -8.65% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.85% | -18.72% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -25.04% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | -33.47% | -0.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.52% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -4.48% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.00% | -0.05% |
Volatility
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.60%. This indicates that MXWO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXWO.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 2.60% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 8.02% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 11.02% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 15.57% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 16.75% | -0.82% |
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXWO.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXWO.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MXWO.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for MXWO.L.
MXWO.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. MXWO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXWO.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for MXWO.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer