PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXWO.L is traded in USD, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MXWO.L having a 9.99% return and SPXP.L slightly higher at 10.28%. Over the past 10 years, MXWO.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 13.12%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


MXWO.L

1D
0.04%
1M
4.21%
YTD
9.99%
6M
11.10%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
13.12%

SPXP.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.64%
YTD
10.28%
6M
11.31%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXWO.L
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF
9.99%20.83%19.19%24.56%-18.08%22.12%16.27%27.41%-9.08%22.79%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.28%17.79%25.46%26.40%-18.54%30.07%17.39%31.85%-5.42%21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MXWO.L and SPXP.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014

0.78

The correlation between MXWO.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MXWO.L
SPXP.L

Technology

28.3%
35.6%

Financial Services

15.7%
11.8%

Industrials

11.4%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.3%
11.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.9%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Technology

MXWO.L
28.3%
SPXP.L
35.6%

Financial Services

MXWO.L
15.7%
SPXP.L
11.8%

Industrials

MXWO.L
11.4%
SPXP.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MXWO.L
9.3%
SPXP.L
10.1%

Communication Services

MXWO.L
9.3%
SPXP.L
11.2%

Healthcare

MXWO.L
8.8%
SPXP.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

MXWO.L
5.2%
SPXP.L
4.9%

Energy

MXWO.L
4.2%
SPXP.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

MXWO.L
3.3%
SPXP.L
1.8%

Utilities

MXWO.L
2.7%
SPXP.L
2.4%

Real Estate

MXWO.L
1.9%
SPXP.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXWO.L
MXWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MXWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXWO.LSPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.23

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

13.97

-0.63

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXWO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXWO.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXWO.LSPXP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.53

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.90

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

1.01

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.96

-0.10

Drawdowns

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXWO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXWO.L and SPXP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXWO.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-33.47%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-8.65%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.85%

-18.72%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-25.04%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-33.47%

-0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.52%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-4.48%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.00%

-0.05%

Volatility

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.60%. This indicates that MXWO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXWO.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.60%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

8.02%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

11.02%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

15.57%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

16.75%

-0.82%

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXWO.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXWO.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXWO.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MXWO.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for MXWO.L.

MXWO.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. MXWO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for MXWO.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXWO.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer