MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L
MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXUS.L returned 15.05%/yr vs 16.80%/yr for X7PP.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXUS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for X7PP.L.
Performance
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MXUS.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXUS.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 15.00% return. Over the past 10 years, MXUS.L has underperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 15.05%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.
MXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 51.53%
- 3Y*
- 45.97%
- 5Y*
- 31.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.80%
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 10.31% | 17.34% | 25.58% | 27.83% | -20.03% | 27.90% | 20.98% | 31.00% | -4.94% | 20.78% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 15.00% | 101.94% | 24.95% | 29.78% | -5.30% | 27.99% | -16.01% | 12.68% | -30.33% | 27.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXUS.L and X7PP.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014 | 0.53 |
The correlation between MXUS.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Financial Services
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
Communication Services
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Healthcare
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Industrials
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Energy
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Utilities
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Real Estate
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Basic Materials
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXUS.L
X7PP.L
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXUS.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.83 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 8.95 | +1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and X7PP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXUS.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -62.74% | +28.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -18.12% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.78% | -19.96% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -38.99% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | -62.18% | +27.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.78% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -22.11% | +18.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 5.74% | -3.65% |
Volatility
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) is 2.84%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that MXUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXUS.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 5.83% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 20.31% | -11.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 23.81% | -11.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 26.31% | -10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 26.46% | -10.18% |
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXUS.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MXUS.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
MXUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. MXUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUS.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.
Find the right allocation for MXUS.L and X7PP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer