PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXUS.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXUS.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 15.00% return. Over the past 10 years, MXUS.L has underperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 15.05%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.


MXUS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.23%
6M
9.97%
YTD
10.31%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
15.05%

X7PP.L

1D
0.39%
1M
5.30%
6M
12.54%
YTD
15.00%
1Y
51.53%
3Y*
45.97%
5Y*
31.35%
10Y*
16.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
10.31%17.34%25.58%27.83%-20.03%27.90%20.98%31.00%-4.94%20.78%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
15.00%101.94%24.95%29.78%-5.30%27.99%-16.01%12.68%-30.33%27.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MXUS.L and X7PP.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014

0.53

The correlation between MXUS.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MXUS.L
X7PP.L

Technology

38.9%

-

Financial Services

10.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

10.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Energy

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.0%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

MXUS.L
38.9%
X7PP.L

-

Financial Services

MXUS.L
10.9%
X7PP.L
100.0%

Communication Services

MXUS.L
10.7%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

MXUS.L
9.9%
X7PP.L

-

Healthcare

MXUS.L
8.4%
X7PP.L

-

Industrials

MXUS.L
8.1%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

MXUS.L
4.4%
X7PP.L

-

Energy

MXUS.L
3.2%
X7PP.L

-

Utilities

MXUS.L
2.0%
X7PP.L

-

Real Estate

MXUS.L
1.8%
X7PP.L

-

Basic Materials

MXUS.L
1.7%
X7PP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXUS.L
MXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXUS.LX7PP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.83

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

8.95

+1.34

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXUS.L and X7PP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and X7PP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXUS.LX7PP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-62.74%

+28.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-18.12%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-19.96%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.25%

-38.99%

+13.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

-62.18%

+27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.78%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-22.11%

+18.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

5.74%

-3.65%

Volatility

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) is 2.84%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that MXUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXUS.LX7PP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

5.83%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

20.31%

-11.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

23.81%

-11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

26.31%

-10.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

26.46%

-10.18%

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXUS.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MXUS.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MXUS.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.

MXUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. MXUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUS.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXUS.L and X7PP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer