MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L
MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - MXUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MXUS.L returned 13.58%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for VWRA.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MXUS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRA.L.
Performance
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXUS.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than VWRA.L's 11.59% return.
MXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
VWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- —
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 10.31% | 17.34% | 25.57% | 27.84% | -20.03% | 27.90% | 20.98% | 7.40% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 11.59% | 22.45% | 17.65% | 22.28% | -18.11% | 18.46% | 16.19% | 7.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXUS.L and VWRA.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MXUS.L and VWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Financial Services
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Communication Services
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Healthcare
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Industrials
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Defensive
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Energy
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Utilities
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Real Estate
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Basic Materials
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXUS.L
VWRA.L
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXUS.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.25 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 13.63 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXUS.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.31 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.73 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.78 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRA.L drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and VWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXUS.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -33.62% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -8.78% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.78% | -16.26% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -26.06% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.75% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -5.39% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.10% | -0.12% |
Volatility
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) is 3.20%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that MXUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXUS.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 3.87% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 9.78% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 12.36% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 15.36% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 17.28% | -0.86% |
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXUS.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXUS.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MXUS.L and VWRA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.
MXUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. MXUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUS.L and 0.22% for VWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for MXUS.L and VWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer