MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L
MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and TPXG.L (Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY) are both exchange-traded funds - MXUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while TPXG.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MXUS.L returned 13.58%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for TPXG.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MXUS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TPXG.L.
Performance
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MXUS.L is traded in USD, while TPXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TPXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXUS.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than TPXG.L's 14.67% return.
MXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
TPXG.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- —
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 10.31% | 17.34% | 25.57% | 27.84% | -20.03% | 27.90% | 20.98% | 31.00% | -5.44% | 9.86% |
TPXG.L Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY | 14.67% | 26.87% | 6.64% | 19.44% | -15.89% | 2.02% | 11.23% | 11.19% | -5.87% | 8.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXUS.L and TPXG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, MXUS.L and TPXG.L have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Financial Services
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Communication Services
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Healthcare
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Industrials
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Consumer Defensive
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Energy
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Utilities
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Real Estate
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Basic Materials
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXUS.L
TPXG.L
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXUS.L | TPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.30 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.46 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 8.21 | +5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXUS.L | TPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 1.61 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.78 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.80 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, which is greater than TPXG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and TPXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXUS.L | TPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -31.56% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -12.44% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.78% | -14.36% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -31.56% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.98% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -7.89% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 3.74% | -1.76% |
Volatility
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) is 3.20%, while Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that MXUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXUS.L | TPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 4.28% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 15.39% | -6.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 19.02% | -7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 22.77% | -6.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 27.70% | -11.28% |
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TPXG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MXUS.L vs. TPXG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXUS.L nor TPXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MXUS.L and TPXG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TPXG.L.
MXUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TPXG.L is Japan Equities. MXUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while TPXG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUS.L and 0.20% for TPXG.L.
Find the right allocation for MXUS.L and TPXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer