MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and BBUD.L (JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MXUS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while BBUD.L tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MXUS.L returned 12.78%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for BBUD.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.

Performance

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) (BBUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MXUS.L having a 10.31% return and BBUD.L slightly lower at 9.91%.

MXUS.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 9.97%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 1Y: 21.58%
• 3Y*: 20.27%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

BBUD.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 9.53%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 1Y: 21.06%
• 3Y*: 19.99%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF	10.31%	17.34%	25.58%	27.83%	-20.03%	27.90%	20.98%	13.98%
BBUD.L JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist)	9.91%	17.41%	25.12%	27.64%	-19.95%	27.63%	20.16%	13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MXUS.L and BBUD.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019	0.99

The correlation between MXUS.L and BBUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXUS.L

MXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
MXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BBUD.L

BBUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
BBUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BBUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BBUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BBUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BBUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) (BBUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MXUS.L	BBUD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.74	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	2.59	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.31	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	2.46	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.29	10.00	+0.30

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the BBUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXUS.L and BBUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUD.L drawdown of -34.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and BBUD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXUS.L	BBUD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.38%	-34.19%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.35%	-8.61%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.78%	-19.33%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.25%	-25.33%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.66%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-5.30%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.12%	-0.03%

Volatility

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) is 2.84%, while JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist) (BBUD.L) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that MXUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXUS.L	BBUD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	3.03%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	9.43%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.09%	12.14%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.26%	16.21%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	17.73%	-1.45%

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MXUS.L and BBUD.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MXUS.L vs. BBUD.L - Dividend Comparison

MXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBUD.L JPM BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF - USD (dist)	1.10%	1.10%	1.01%	1.29%	1.46%	0.95%	1.37%	0.74%
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXUS.L and BBUD.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, MXUS.L and BBUD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MXUS.L or BBUD.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MXUS.L or BBUD.L?

MXUS.L and BBUD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

What is the main difference between MXUS.L and BBUD.L?

MXUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while BBUD.L tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan.