PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXUD.L vs. G500.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXUD.L vs. G500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (G500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXUD.L is traded in USD, while G500.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the G500.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXUD.L achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than G500.L's 8.57% return.


MXUD.L

1D
-1.19%
1M
-0.34%
6M
8.12%
YTD
9.03%
1Y
19.77%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*

G500.L

1D
-1.46%
1M
0.57%
6M
8.27%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXUD.L vs. G500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist
9.03%17.43%25.46%27.85%-19.90%27.77%25.77%
G500.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
8.57%26.32%22.89%31.47%-28.53%27.78%32.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MXUD.L and G500.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.88

The correlation between MXUD.L and G500.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXUD.L vs. G500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXUD.L
MXUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

G500.L
G500.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
G500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
G500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
G500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
G500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXUD.L vs. G500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (G500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXUD.LG500.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.56

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

5.87

+3.58

MXUD.L vs. G500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the G500.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXUD.L and G500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXUD.L vs. G500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum G500.L drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUD.L and G500.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXUD.LG500.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.42%

-39.54%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-12.56%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-17.75%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.22%

-39.54%

+14.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-1.93%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-8.08%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

3.35%

-1.26%

Volatility

MXUD.L vs. G500.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) is 3.16%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (G500.L) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that MXUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXUD.LG500.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

3.77%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

11.77%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

15.07%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

20.38%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

20.09%

-1.86%

MXUD.L vs. G500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MXUD.L and G500.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXUD.L vs. G500.L - Dividend Comparison

MXUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while G500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
G500.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist
1.08%1.13%1.30%1.47%1.66%1.27%1.47%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXUD.L and G500.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUD.L and G500.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

MXUD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while G500.L is US Equities. MXUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while G500.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Daily Hedged Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXUD.L and G500.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer