PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G500.L vs. FLXK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G500.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

G500.L is traded in GBp, while FLXK.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G500.L achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 77.73% return.


G500.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.03%
6M
9.49%
YTD
9.90%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*

FLXK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-18.91%
6M
58.85%
YTD
77.73%
1Y
143.02%
3Y*
38.65%
5Y*
16.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G500.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
G500.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
9.90%17.45%24.98%24.88%-19.98%28.95%20.65%
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
77.73%80.91%-20.26%14.73%-19.45%-5.96%40.76%

Correlation

The correlation between G500.L and FLXK.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.51

The correlation between G500.L and FLXK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

G500.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G500.L
G500.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
G500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
G500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
G500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
G500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXK.L
FLXK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G500.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


G500.LFLXK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

5.83

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

18.65

-7.96

G500.L vs. FLXK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G500.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G500.L and FLXK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

G500.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G500.L drawdown since its inception was -25.20%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G500.L and FLXK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G500.LFLXK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.20%

-41.70%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-24.62%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.22%

-28.10%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-37.51%

+12.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-24.62%

+23.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-17.71%

+12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

7.71%

-5.67%

Volatility

G500.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) is 2.79%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 19.77%. This indicates that G500.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G500.LFLXK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

19.77%

-16.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

40.39%

-31.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

43.92%

-31.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

27.97%

-11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

28.13%

-12.26%

G500.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

G500.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

G500.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither G500.L nor FLXK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


G500.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, G500.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G500.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLXK.L.

G500.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg), while FLXK.L tracks Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for G500.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G500.L and FLXK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer