PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MXUD.L is traded in USD, while FLXU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXUD.L achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than FLXU.L's 11.92% return.


MXUD.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.69%
YTD
10.40%
6M
11.09%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*

FLXU.L

1D
0.03%
1M
4.33%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.80%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
12.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist
10.40%17.43%25.46%27.86%-19.91%26.81%18.82%3.48%
FLXU.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
11.92%21.64%10.61%14.25%-8.73%27.41%8.93%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MXUD.L and FLXU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.84

The correlation between MXUD.L and FLXU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MXUD.L
FLXU.L

Technology

35.4%
34.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
9.9%

Communication Services

11.3%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
10.5%

Industrials

8.6%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.4%

Energy

3.6%
1.0%

Utilities

2.3%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

MXUD.L
35.4%
FLXU.L
34.3%

Financial Services

MXUD.L
11.6%
FLXU.L
9.9%

Communication Services

MXUD.L
11.3%
FLXU.L
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MXUD.L
10.1%
FLXU.L
11.5%

Healthcare

MXUD.L
8.6%
FLXU.L
10.5%

Industrials

MXUD.L
8.6%
FLXU.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

MXUD.L
4.8%
FLXU.L
4.4%

Energy

MXUD.L
3.6%
FLXU.L
1.0%

Utilities

MXUD.L
2.3%
FLXU.L
1.6%

Real Estate

MXUD.L
1.9%
FLXU.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

MXUD.L
1.8%
FLXU.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXUD.L
MXUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXU.L
FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXUD.LFLXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.43

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

15.50

-1.40

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXUD.L and FLXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXUD.LFLXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.44

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.87

-0.01

Drawdowns

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than FLXU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUD.L and FLXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXUD.LFLXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-33.00%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-8.55%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-19.48%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.22%

-19.48%

-5.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.14%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-3.86%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.90%

+0.06%

Volatility

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXUD.LFLXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.37%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

9.24%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

12.03%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

14.14%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

15.66%

+2.80%

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXUD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXUD.L vs. FLXU.L - Dividend Comparison

MXUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while FLXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FLXU.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MXUD.L
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist
1.05%1.14%1.30%1.47%1.66%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MXUD.L and FLXU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MXUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXU.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUD.L and 0.25% for FLXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXUD.L and FLXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer