MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L
MXUD.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist) and EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MXUD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while EQGB.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MXUD.L returned 13.61%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for EQGB.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXUD.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQGB.L.
Performance
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MXUD.L is traded in USD, while EQGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXUD.L achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than EQGB.L's 18.57% return.
MXUD.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- —
EQGB.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 18.57%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 37.80%
- 3Y*
- 30.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- —
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUD.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist | 10.40% | 17.43% | 25.46% | 27.86% | -19.91% | 26.81% | 18.82% | 3.48% |
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 18.57% | 28.61% | 24.02% | 62.04% | -42.01% | 26.53% | 49.89% | 7.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXUD.L and EQGB.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MXUD.L and EQGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Financial Services
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Communication Services
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Healthcare
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Industrials
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Consumer Defensive
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Energy
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Utilities
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Real Estate
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Basic Materials
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
MXUD.L
EQGB.L
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXUD.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.34 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.52 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 9.34 | +4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXUD.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.05 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.61 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.79 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum EQGB.L drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUD.L and EQGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXUD.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -47.56% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -14.96% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -22.21% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.22% | -47.56% | +22.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.12% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -9.54% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 4.03% | -2.07% |
Volatility
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) is 3.28%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that MXUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXUD.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 5.53% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 13.97% | -5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 18.40% | -6.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 24.75% | -8.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 24.79% | -6.33% |
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXUD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXUD.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison
MXUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while EQGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
MXUD.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.30% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXUD.L and EQGB.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQGB.L.
MXUD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EQGB.L is Nasdaq-100. MXUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MXUD.L and 0.35% for EQGB.L.
Find the right allocation for MXUD.L and EQGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer