PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXRLX vs. DRILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXRLX vs. DRILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXRLX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than DRILX's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MXRLX has underperformed DRILX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while DRILX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.21% annualized return.


MXRLX

1D
1.49%
1M
-0.06%
6M
6.72%
YTD
9.73%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
9.05%
ALL TIME*
6.66%

DRILX

1D
1.68%
1M
-0.12%
6M
7.61%
YTD
10.77%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
12.21%
ALL TIME*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXRLX vs. DRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXRLX
Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund
9.73%16.52%10.39%16.96%-16.86%16.12%13.50%25.56%-12.99%20.69%
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
10.77%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%25.61%-9.07%21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MXRLX and DRILX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.83

The correlation between MXRLX and DRILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXRLX vs. DRILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXRLX
MXRLX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MXRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MXRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXRLX vs. DRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXRLXDRILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.54

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

10.64

-2.43

MXRLX vs. DRILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the DRILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXRLX and DRILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXRLX vs. DRILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXRLX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, which is greater than DRILX's maximum drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXRLX and DRILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXRLXDRILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.66%

-33.48%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-8.58%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-15.76%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.66%

-23.50%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.95%

-33.48%

+0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-1.44%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-4.19%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.99%

+0.11%

Volatility

MXRLX vs. DRILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund (MXRLX) is 2.95%, while Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that MXRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXRLXDRILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

3.38%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

9.90%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

12.09%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

14.95%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

15.69%

+0.42%

MXRLX vs. DRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXRLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than DRILX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXRLX vs. DRILX - Dividend Comparison

MXRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than DRILX's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.82%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%
MXRLX
Great-West Lifetime 2045 Fund
4.20%4.61%6.48%4.42%9.59%10.39%5.64%10.54%11.75%3.37%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MXRLX and DRILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRILX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to MXRLX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXRLX dropped -40.66% vs DRILX's -33.48%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXRLX and DRILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer