MXMPX vs. DGTSX
MXMPX (Great-West Moderate Profile Fund) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, MXMPX returned 6.32%/yr vs 5.07%/yr for DGTSX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MXMPX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.
Performance
MXMPX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXMPX achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than DGTSX's 4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MXMPX has outperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 6.32%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.07% annualized return.
MXMPX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- 10.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.16%
DGTSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 1Y
- 8.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 5.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXMPX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXMPX Great-West Moderate Profile Fund | 7.77% | 11.96% | 7.75% | 12.13% | -11.86% | 11.97% | 11.04% | 17.43% | -11.39% | 15.83% |
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 4.21% | 8.39% | 7.43% | 8.93% | -8.06% | 10.20% | 7.29% | 9.80% | -1.85% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXMPX and DGTSX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2003 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MXMPX and DGTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (10 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXMPX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank
MXMPX
DGTSX
MXMPX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Moderate Profile Fund (MXMPX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXMPX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 3.02 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 13.04 | -6.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXMPX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXMPX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMPX and DGTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXMPX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -16.71% | -36.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.12% | -2.64% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.49% | -7.46% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -11.26% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.55% | -11.26% | -13.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.28% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.07% | -1.64% | -19.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 0.61% | +1.53% |
Volatility
MXMPX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Moderate Profile Fund (MXMPX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 0.91%. This indicates that MXMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXMPX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.86% | 0.91% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.51% | 3.01% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.10% | 3.65% | +7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.77% | 5.98% | +5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 5.23% | +6.53% |
MXMPX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXMPX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXMPX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison
MXMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than DGTSX's 5.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 5.81% | 5.54% | 7.28% | 4.75% | 2.77% | 7.62% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.99% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.50% |
MXMPX Great-West Moderate Profile Fund | 7.05% | 7.60% | 7.42% | 4.79% | 9.64% | 7.84% | 3.00% | 9.98% | 10.12% | 4.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, MXMPX and DGTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MXMPX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to DGTSX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXMPX dropped -53.35% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.
DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXMPX and DGTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer