MXMGX vs. WWNPX
MXMGX (Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MXMGX returned 9.38%/yr vs 18.11%/yr for WWNPX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXMGX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.
Performance
MXMGX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXMGX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MXMGX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.11% annualized return.
MXMGX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
WWNPX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- -0.67%
- 3Y*
- 29.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
MXMGX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXMGX Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund | 1.65% | 2.99% | 9.02% | 19.61% | -22.82% | 15.25% | 23.65% | 31.28% | -2.80% | 23.89% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 15.12% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 28.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXMGX and WWNPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1999 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MXMGX and WWNPX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXMGX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
MXMGX
WWNPX
MXMGX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXMGX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.02 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | -0.08 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | -0.19 | +1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXMGX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXMGX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMGX and WWNPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXMGX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.97% | -67.87% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -27.71% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | -41.13% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.33% | -41.13% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.88% | -43.51% | +7.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -30.22% | +28.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -13.93% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 11.99% | -8.95% |
Volatility
MXMGX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund (MXMGX) is 4.50%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that MXMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXMGX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 9.90% | -5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 26.89% | -16.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 33.65% | -19.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 33.01% | -13.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 28.70% | -9.76% |
MXMGX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXMGX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXMGX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
MXMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than WWNPX's 7.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXMGX Great-West T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund | 1.65% | 1.68% | 3.66% | 2.39% | 2.66% | 4.92% | 2.74% | 2.19% | 6.13% | 4.53% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 7.13% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXMGX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWNPX has higher volatility (9.90%) compared to MXMGX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXMGX dropped -60.97% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.
MXMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXMGX and WWNPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer