PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXMDX vs. MXBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXMDX vs. MXBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) and Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXMDX achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly higher than MXBSX's 10.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXMDX having a 10.09% annualized return and MXBSX not far ahead at 10.29%.


MXMDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.43%
YTD
13.81%
6M
13.44%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.09%

MXBSX

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.81%
YTD
10.07%
6M
10.63%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXMDX vs. MXBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
13.81%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
10.07%17.70%11.16%17.79%-16.61%16.82%13.96%26.31%-10.30%20.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MXMDX and MXBSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.75

The correlation between MXMDX and MXBSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXMDX vs. MXBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MXBSX
MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXMDX vs. MXBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) and Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXMDXMXBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.63

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

10.93

-0.41

MXMDX vs. MXBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the MXBSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXMDX and MXBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXMDXMXBSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.88

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.50

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.63

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.64

-0.20

Drawdowns

MXMDX vs. MXBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXMDX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, which is greater than MXBSX's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMDX and MXBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXMDXMXBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-31.88%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.80%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.15%

-14.76%

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.15%

-29.68%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.80%

-31.88%

-9.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.57%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-5.94%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.11%

+0.36%

Volatility

MXMDX vs. MXBSX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) at 3.33%. This indicates that MXMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXMDXMXBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.33%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

8.93%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

12.32%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

15.89%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

16.37%

+4.85%

MXMDX vs. MXBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXMDX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBSX's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXMDX vs. MXBSX - Dividend Comparison

MXMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than MXBSX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
4.79%5.27%7.38%5.63%10.66%11.14%6.57%9.46%8.18%3.54%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.85%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXMDX and MXBSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXMDX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to MXBSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXMDX dropped -41.80% vs MXBSX's -31.88%.

MXBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXMDX and MXBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer