PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXMDX vs. FZFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXMDX vs. FZFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXMDX achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly lower than FZFLX's 33.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MXMDX has underperformed FZFLX with an annualized return of 10.09%, while FZFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.


MXMDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.43%
YTD
13.81%
6M
13.44%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.09%

FZFLX

1D
0.17%
1M
4.01%
YTD
33.26%
6M
33.08%
1Y
49.00%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXMDX vs. FZFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
13.81%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
33.26%10.76%15.52%17.75%-15.62%20.40%19.78%31.96%-9.25%18.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MXMDX and FZFLX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2015

0.92

The correlation between MXMDX and FZFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXMDX vs. FZFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FZFLX
FZFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FZFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FZFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXMDX vs. FZFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXMDXFZFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

4.61

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

19.48

-8.96

MXMDX vs. FZFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the FZFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXMDX and FZFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXMDXFZFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.37

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.57

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.67

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.63

-0.18

Drawdowns

MXMDX vs. FZFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXMDX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FZFLX drawdown of -42.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMDX and FZFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXMDXFZFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-42.03%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-10.68%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.15%

-22.29%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.15%

-24.77%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.80%

-42.03%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.17%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-5.74%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.52%

-0.05%

Volatility

MXMDX vs. FZFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) is 4.37%, while Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that MXMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXMDXFZFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

7.40%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

17.70%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

20.84%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

21.11%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

21.10%

+0.12%

MXMDX vs. FZFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXMDX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FZFLX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXMDX vs. FZFLX - Dividend Comparison

MXMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than FZFLX's 43.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
43.35%57.77%10.20%2.35%79.79%50.77%7.19%6.49%7.69%1.68%0.93%0.67%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.85%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXMDX and FZFLX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZFLX has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to MXMDX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXMDX dropped -41.80% vs FZFLX's -42.03%.

FZFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXMDX and FZFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer