MXMDX vs. DNLDX
MXMDX (Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund) and DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MXMDX returned 9.83%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for DNLDX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MXMDX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for DNLDX.
Performance
MXMDX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MXMDX having a 15.47% return and DNLDX slightly higher at 15.76%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXMDX having a 9.83% annualized return and DNLDX not far ahead at 10.16%.
MXMDX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.01%
DNLDX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXMDX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXMDX Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund | 15.47% | 6.90% | 13.23% | 15.75% | -13.60% | 24.25% | 12.84% | 25.48% | -12.02% | 15.01% |
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 15.76% | 9.79% | 22.27% | 16.99% | -14.34% | 26.49% | 9.29% | 16.82% | -14.46% | 16.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXMDX and DNLDX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between MXMDX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXMDX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank
MXMDX
DNLDX
MXMDX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXMDX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 3.03 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 11.33 | -2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXMDX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXMDX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMDX and DNLDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXMDX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -63.69% | +21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.87% | -7.29% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.15% | -20.42% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.15% | -23.42% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.80% | -42.23% | +0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | 0.00% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -9.60% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 1.95% | +0.52% |
Volatility
MXMDX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) at 2.97%. This indicates that MXMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXMDX | DNLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 2.97% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 10.05% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 13.46% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 18.50% | +1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 19.46% | +1.71% |
MXMDX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXMDX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXMDX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison
MXMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, less than DNLDX's 12.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 12.98% | 14.15% | 15.24% | 1.69% | 8.82% | 17.74% | 2.77% | 2.65% | 11.14% | 11.32% | 1.00% | 3.12% |
MXMDX Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund | 5.77% | 6.66% | 3.04% | 4.76% | 4.35% | 5.24% | 5.74% | 3.74% | 8.13% | 4.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, MXMDX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MXMDX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to DNLDX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXMDX dropped -41.80% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.
DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXMDX and DNLDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer