PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLZX vs. MXMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLZX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLZX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than MXMDX's 13.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLZX has underperformed MXMDX with an annualized return of 5.48%, while MXMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.09% annualized return.


MXLZX

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.20%
YTD
4.44%
6M
4.62%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
5.48%

MXMDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.43%
YTD
13.81%
6M
13.44%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLZX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLZX
Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund
4.44%9.92%6.22%10.36%-12.33%8.53%10.83%15.41%-7.03%11.09%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
13.81%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLZX and MXMDX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2011

0.79

The correlation between MXLZX and MXMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLZX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLZX
MXLZX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MXLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLZX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXLZXMXMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.94

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.80

10.52

+0.28

MXLZX vs. MXMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the MXMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLZX and MXMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXLZXMXMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.71

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.39

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.48

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.45

+0.05

Drawdowns

MXLZX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLZX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum MXMDX drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLZX and MXMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLZXMXMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-41.80%

+21.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-8.87%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.49%

-24.15%

+17.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.60%

-24.15%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.60%

-41.80%

+21.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.12%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-5.95%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

2.47%

-1.42%

Volatility

MXLZX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund (MXLZX) is 1.78%, while Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that MXLZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLZXMXMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

4.37%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.37%

11.28%

-6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.72%

15.28%

-9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

19.99%

-11.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

21.22%

-12.81%

MXLZX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLZX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLZX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison

MXLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than MXMDX's 5.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLZX
Great-West Lifetime 2015 Fund
3.29%3.43%4.50%4.14%7.81%7.85%2.96%6.00%5.91%2.12%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.85%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLZX and MXMDX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXMDX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to MXLZX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLZX dropped -20.60% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.

MXLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLZX and MXMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer